Hi Luke,
Excellent to hear that lca2011 speakers were asked to keep their slide
decks G-rated. Certainly we asked them that for LCA2010 [0]. Given
that speakers were asked that this year too, we think that's reason to
consider the slides inappropriate for the LCA audience. (We still don't
think it is harrasment...)
We think that future LCA's should include the G-rated request for the
slide-decks in the T&Cs so that the request is transparent to all
delegates and sponsors. However, we think some profanity should be
allowed and discretion should be allowed for that.
Cheers!
Andrew & Susanne
[0] From the LCA2010 Speakers Info page (and various emails): Please
read our Terms and Conditions to ensure that your talk is pitched
appropriately for LCA2010 (that includes keeping slide-decks G-rated)
--
Andrew Ruthven
Wellington, New Zealand
At home: andrew at etc.gen.nz | linux.conf.au 2011
| Follow the flow! Head to Brisbane!
| http://www.followtheflow.org
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 190 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.followtheflow.org/pipermail/chat/attachments/20110201/fca3ea99/attachment-0001.pgp>
Received on Tue Feb 01 2011 - 23:59:53 GMT